Suppose every time you went out for dinner, as a property taxpayer, you had to pick up the tab for everyone else in the restaurant who didn’t pay property taxes. It wouldn’t seem very fair. Yet this is exactly the way we fund our local transit costs in Wisconsin.
It’s time to change the equation and share the costs the same way almost every other metro area in the country does. We need to quit putting the tab on the people who pay property taxes and share the tab with those who live here and those who visit for work and play.
Although most other major metropolitan regions around the nation have adapted to economic conditions by shifting their public infrastructure to sales tax funding systems, Milwaukee County continues to rely upon the antiquated funding model that most others shifted away from in the 70s.
Rather than continue to depend upon a regressive source - property taxes - to fund major infrastructure necessities such as transit, we need to get in line with other major metropolitan areas of the country.
We need to change the way we fund critical services in Milwaukee County. We need to shift the majority of the burden off property owners and rely on funding sources that take advantage of the out-of-region visitors who come into our county for work, shopping, recreation and travel. A sales tax would achieve this objective.
Failure to change and adopt this system in Milwaukee County will lead to the loss of critical services sooner than you may think. For example, Milwaukee County’s transit system is suffering so badly from the inadequate level of funding it currently receives as part of the regressive, property taxpayer-funded system, that the following cuts could be expected in 2011 if this system isn’t changed in the current legislative session:
- Elimination of all freeway fliers which provide regional service;
- Elimination of all bus service to local colleges and universities;
- Elimination of special event service to Summerfest, Brewers games and other festivals; and
- Elimination of one of every three bus routes, and major restructuring of 14 other routes.
It is time to realize that our region and state need to move forward and adapt our infrastructure investments to the sales tax funding system that has worked successfully throughout the country. Other major metropolitan areas maintain thriving infrastructure systems - such as public bus and commuter rail transit systems - without overburdening the property owners of those regions.
Failure to make this critical change will result in job loss, continued high unemployment because workers cannot connect to jobs, inability for the elderly and disabled to access critical services such as health care, and will serve as another barrier to education in our county. Losing our transit system would be devastating to an area struggling to recreate its economy and job base.
The business community in this region has rallied to save our local transit system by supporting the efforts to shift the cost of transit infrastructure off of the property tax rolls to a sales tax. As companies focused on creating jobs and prospering through a challenging environment, their success depends on their ability to change and adapt to meet the supply and demand of the market. It’s time for our lawmakers in Madison to listen to this loud, clear call from the business community and to change the way we fund critical infrastructure services, rather than risk losing them and our status as a thriving metropolitan region.
Julia Taylor is president of the Greater Milwaukee Committee.




26 Comments
Boo Hoo! This tax shift idea is a total scam. It will not reduce property taxes and it will immediately increase our taxes by $20 million. If Milwaukee County Transit is so broke, why does Julia Taylor want to add the KRM and the slow train to the Madison airport to our tax rolls? Tax and spenders like Julia Taylor have an unending appetite for taxpayer money and don't have a clue about job creation (negative job grown in Milwaukee County since Ms. Taylor has been head of the Greater Milwaukee Committee).
Also, as I have stated earlier in these posts, we do not need another undemocratic, unaccountable, and unelected taxing authority to lord over us. These unelected taxing authorities need to be banned in Wisconsin.
Finally, it is important to reiterate that this supposed tax shift from property to sales taxes includes a $20 million tax increase (apparently Ms. Taylor doesn't want you to know that fact). In 1991 a similar increase in the sales tax was made with the promise to relieve property taxes- guess what happened- the tax and spenders raised property taxes right back up and over their previous levels. They always want more.
Bill, do you even live in Milwaukee county? Will this not save you money because you don't pay any property taxes here?
Yeah Jesse, I live in the county, is that all you got?
Here's a idea: Why don't we eliminate all tax burdens related to the mass transit systems and let the people who actually use the system pay for it. Shift from taxes to rider rates! If they system can't make enough money to fund itself through fees it should be shut down!
Bill, you're hysterical... I'm just trying to see if this affects you or if you are purely ideologically driven. The jury is still out on that...
I would be all for shifting to a user fee basis only, right after the airports and roads are only funded with user fees.
So Jesse, now that I have answered your question. Please answer mine. Are you a government employee or do you work for a democratic party politician?
PS. I notice the left never really debates issues on this site. They just name call, point fingers, or at best regurgitate some feel good propaganda without any facts to back themselves up. Jesse, you don't disappoint.
Jesse:
"General Mitchell International Airport is owned by Milwaukee County and operated by the Department of Transportation & Public Works, Airport Division, under the policy direction of the Milwaukee County Executive and the County Board of Supervisors. The airport is entirely funded by user fees; no property tax dollars are used for the airport's capital improvements or for its day-to-day operation."
You've got a good sense of humor Silence. Do you remember those airline bailouts a couple years ago, what was that? Also, how do these airports pay for any expansion?
It's all fed money, just like what built the freeways. That money is coming out of our paycheck, whether we use the airports or not. Is it still a level playing field?
No public sector work for me or any political jobs. How about you Bill, are you typing this from an AFSCME office somewhere or do you work in the private sector? Working for a politician or as a lobbyist doesn't count, that's still on the public dole as far as I'm concerned.
Federal dollars built the airports. Federal dollars add runways. Federal dollars pay for the FAA that keeps the planes in the air. It's all federally subsidized. But that's the idea. It's federally subsidized for the common good of the people. That's also true for mass transit. Airports, interstate freeways, buses, trains, bridges ... They all need to be subsidized. And they are great public investments. Period.
Also, I don't know who this Bill Marsh guy is. But what a pathetic loser he is. What, does he just troll around blogs that people write and then post nasty comments on all of them? All day? Every day? Get a life. He never has a good thing to say about anyone. He never has any ideas of his own. He just criticizes everyone else. What a loser.
Thanks Russin for proving my point about lefties- all name-calling, no substance. Apparently you want me to shut up because you can't debate the issues and you don't like the fact I don't agree with your little leftist ideas. Tough luck.
If you want fairness with subsidies, why don't we have all transportation uses ie. freeways, airports and trains subsidized at the same level per rider/mile? On top of that, how about taxing train riders like we tax airline tickets and gasoline. You would soon find out that the trains would have to stop running because of their pathetically low ridership. But don't get me wrong, I do support trains where they are necessary such as the line between Milwaukee and Chicago, the Metra lines in Chicago, and commuter lines in other dense areas of the country. I just don't support boondoggles.
The bottom line here is that a tax shift is a bad idea. There's no such thing as a tax shift. If this proposal ever comes to fruition what you will see is a raise in sales tax and NO decrease in property taxes. The gov't is greedy and they just want more money! MCTS needs to reduce their costs and increase their user fees. If they can't figure it out I say the MCTS should be eliminated and allow a private company to come in create a profitable mass transit system.
Hey Silence, MCTS provides a better return than the highways. Last I checked, you had to pay a fare to ride the bus. I've never seen a toll booth in WI, gas taxes don't cover costs either.
MCTS has some of the lowest costs in the country and one of the highest amount of $ returned at the farebox. Where does WIDOT rank?
BM Wrote: "PS. I notice the left never really debates issues on this site. They just name call, point fingers, or at best regurgitate some feel good propaganda without any facts to back themselves up. Jesse, you don't disappoint."
You do know this statement makes you a hipocrite, right? I'm not calling names, I'm calling a spade, a spade. If you can't deal with it, that's your problem. Toughen up or unplug your computer.
Truth to tell we will have to watch future county boards to prevent what Bill Marsh first expressed a fear of. Fear of the future is, however, no reason to avoid the truth about the future.
The facts are (Center for Economic Development study, April 2009) that 100,000 jobs will be inaccessible to transit if the next round of bus cuts (30% that Julia refers to) are put into play. This WILL happen without dedicated funding. Ironically it WILL happen just after Stimulus funds bring new buses to Milwaukee.
Separating workers from jobs is the last thing our economy needs just now. With the loss of general welfare whole neighborhoods will be isolated from these jobs. Employers will have a smaller (fewer skills) labor pool to draw on; and businesses will have to rely only on folks who can walk or drive to their shops.
OR, we could have a surge in drivers who have no license or insurance. This must not be permitted to one of the great American cities, Milwaukee. We have a historic culture of working, taking care of our neighbors, and making our way without handouts. What we don't want now is a handout; we want Madison to honor our referendum in which we said we want to tax ourselves and our visitors half cent on a dollar to rebuild our bus system.
Jesse- You got me there. I guess calling a person who continually wants to tax and spend a "tax and spender" is name calling, or is that calling a spade a spade? In your world is that the same as calling someone a troll or a loser? As to facts and analysis, you have said it all - "MCTS provides a better return than the highways. Last I checked, you had to pay a fare to ride the bus. I've never seen a toll booth in WI, gas taxes don't cover costs either."
PS- it's hypocrite
Bob Sell - I'm curious where the 100,000 jobs exist that could be cut off from transportation? Knowing this information would allow for planning.
I believe we need public mass transit. There is not a progressive growing city in the US that does not have a publicly subsidized mass transit plan and most of them use a sales tax. We voted to use the sales tax to subsidize our mass transit as long as the funds for transit came off of our property tax. If we allow the county to not reduce or property tax after we make this deal than shame on us, but I do not stand with those who believe it's automatic and unavoidable.
At the recent RTA hearing in Madison hundreds of people from all walks of life in Milwaukee county and southeastern Wisconsin testified in favor of the RTA and the dedicated funding source. No one testified against it.
As he mayor of Racine said at that hearing. We are not competing with other cities for growth through jobs, we are competing with other countries. Our prospects lie with people who expect and want to be located in communities that have modern public transportation systems
Bob Johnson, First of all that is Bill here. Thanks.
If you look at the Transit map of Milwaukee County you see the answer to your question. The entire southern end of Milwaukee County has almost no transit; and what it does have requires a car or bicycle to access. Even the roads leading to these park and rides are not suitable for pedestrians. The northwestern part of Milwaukee County, also. While there is more service up there some of those bus lines do not serve second or third shift workers. Second shift (I'm sure you know from your college days) is the entry shift, when you start work with barely enough for lunch money, to say nothing about buying a car.
Are you a planner? Would you care to contribute to a citizen's advisory committee?
The transit study I reference is available at http://ow.ly/1rzQ0 (100,000 jobs inaccessible to transit, among other effects of cuts)
Thanks Bill for the spellcheck, once again you've elevated the conversation of an important topic to a new level.
Bill Sell- you're link regarding 100,000 jobs did not go through, please re-post. Thanks
Bill Marsh, thanks for the alert. It's a google-groups thing. The system puts another link on the page (and it sort of looks like an error page) and you need to click that second link, which is heavily coded. http: // ow.ly/1rzQ0 (take those spaces out) The second link starts as /WEB/UWM-CED.....
Let me know. I can put it on another web site if necessary. It's an excellent study.
"Silence Dogood" wrote: "Why don't we eliminate all tax burdens related to the mass transit systems and let the people who actually use the system pay for it. Shift from taxes to rider rates! If they system can't make enough money to fund itself through fees it should be shut down!"
This simplistic, wornout old argument has always been invalid because then we'd have to charge fire victims for all the costs of sending firefighters out to save their property, and crime victims for the costs associated with pursuing their cases, and parents for the costs of teaching their children, and airline passengers for the costs related to takeoffs, landings and traffic control, and motorists for all the construction and upkeep on bridges and roads which currently are largely paid for through income taxes such as the Marquette Interchange was.
Update: On Tuesday April 6th, 2010, St. Louis County MO citizens approved Proposition A, a half-cent sales tax increase to support MetroLink light rail and bus service, despite the economy. Sixty-three percent of those voting supported the tax to provide up to $90 million per year to pay for operation and expansion of the transit system, including growth in light rail routes in the bi-state St. Louis metro area. I predict the RTA question will pass solidly in Southeastern Wisconsin.