As our nation decides where to spend millions in economic stimulus funds, it is imperative we seek funding for innovative education models to protect taxpayer investment.
From kindergarten through high school, we invest millions in students' education. But when those students with challenges face the decision of dropping out, we often resist investing in environments outside of a traditional classroom.
Too often we focus on undoing ramifications once students fail, rather than protecting our investment by creating situations where they thrive and graduate with their class. Add to the mix an economic crisis that impacts all of us, and we have a recipe for economic pull back - en from innovative models that get results.
Based on dropout rates, we know student demand exists for innovative education. What remains unknown, however, is the level of financial support educational models like Second Chance Partners for Education and other proven models will receive to extend help to more students, parents, businesses and schools.
Yes, we all are in this together. Many local businesses need an influx of skilled workers as baby boomers and their collective knowledge retire. Schools need options when they identify credit deficient students who, for example, might merely learn differently in a more hands on way. Not all students are bound for a four-year college. But all are bound for adulthood. These students need a meaningful education that will set them up for success as an adult.
Not long ago, we witnessed an innovative approach to filling a shortage of skilled welders needed by Bucyrus International Inc. chief executive officer Tim Sullivan. He partnered with Milwaukee Area Technical College to create a welder training program to fill the void. Without innovative approaches and support, financial and otherwise, this solution would not have existed.
If we don't bring together parents, students, schools, businesses and government within innovative solutions to stem the dropout rate and enhance our skilled workforce, it won't be a matter of if we pay, but when and how long we pay, for students allowed to fail.
Our Second Chance business partners, such as Generac, Waukesha Electric, Husco and others, are already playing a distinct role in successfully working with public schools in southeastern Wisconsin. During the 21 months our students spend working, learning and absorbing knowledge of seasoned employees, they develop marketable skills and often go on to bigger and better outcomes, including a diploma 90 percent of the time.
These businesses and others understand the bottom line. We support these students with proven educational models that get results today - or we support them with taxes for eternity. That's the bottom line.
Stephanie Borowski is the executive director of Second Chance Partners for Education, an integrated education model that graduates 90 percent of some of the most disengaged students in southeastern Wisconsin. To contact her about the program, send an e-mail to sborowski3@wctc.edu.




5 Comments
Stephanie,
I've had the opportunity to see some of these "alternative" educational models in action. Most do not work and throwing money to them is simply employing more teachers, usually the least employable teachers.
Tim Sullivan's model of partnership is a good example. His company needed more welders. There were not enough trained welders here. Rather than raise wages and benefits to attract more welders from other parts of the State of WI, Mr. Sullivan got MATC to help train welders, probably at taxpayer's expense. So he avoided raising wages and benefits, avoided having to do and pay for the training of new welders through his company, and spread out the cost of new welder training throughout the MATC tax district. I'm certain Bucyrus contributed something to get this program going, but they did not bear the full brunt of its cost.
Now let's go to your last point. We do not have to support failing students with taxes for eternity. In fact, our state has supported educational failure with taxes for a long time. That's why we have so much of it.
You are pleased that 90% of the non traditional students get a diploma. I would be pleased if they could write a complete sentence, show up on time, be polite to everyone, and understand the importance of their demeanor and appearance. No diploma require for that.
I applaud your desire to do good in the world Stephanie. However, the place to do good is not in the aftermath of failed schools but rather at the root of the failure.
Milwaukee needs to get off the money train approach to education and get back to the high expectations of the past. 90% may seem enviable in the world of Milwaukee Public Schools but in the rest of the world 100% is the expectation and the norm.
Rather than an "always time to do it over but never time to do it right" mentality; we need to uncerimoniouly dump our board and get some people in there who really care about education. Not people who care enough to fill the position, but people who care enough to say stop, let's get back to what works and let's do it tomorrow.
Unfortunately, those types of people have things to do, businesses to run and families to care for. Find someone who does not want to be on the board and you'll find the right person to be there.
I would also like to applaud your desire to do good in this world. I am writing this because I strongly support your program and I am a success story myself. I am 29 years old and I went through a program similar to this in 1997. I have maintained employmenent with the same employer for the past nine years, something I thought would never be possible. I am very proud of my current position and look forward to serving members in my community each and every day. Without these programs at risk teens may never receive a high school diploma or be productive members of our workforce. I would really like to thank the taxpayers for the supporting these programs. I too am a taxpayer!
I'm pleased Bob and Art have provided an opportunity to clarify some of the points made within their individual posts. Unfortunately, mass generalizations lead to effective and non-effective education models being lumped together. Jennifer's success is a clear example that with the right model it can work. Thankfully Bob and Art spoke out within this forum, so we can extend an offer to discuss the effectiveness of Second Chance Partners in person. Please email me to set a time for us to discuss why we and our business partners, who generally don't invest in opportunities that fail, would welcome the opportunity to make you advocates for this education model. Stephanie Borowski - sborowski3@wctc.edu
This is a fascinating dialogue that could benefit from a recent story on WISN TV about Second Chance Partners. The link to the video by reporter Terry Sater follows. Ironically, the story is found on WISN TV's homepage under Project Economy.
http://www.wisn.com/video/18676668/index.html
KJR