"Subways are the hope for the world." At least that is what my mother told me before I left Milwaukee for New York City, after graduating four years ago.
There are so many practical reasons why commuter rail and street car systems are a good idea, from economic to environmental; all of which have been clearly illuminated by the supporters of the KRM (Kenosha Racine Milwaukee) line. However, what often lacks from the discussion is a basic humanistic approach.
To explain, I work for the Brooklyn Borough President, the executive political officer for the borough of Brooklyn in New York City, and I take public transportation - the subway. Each working day of the week, I walk from my home to the subway station three blocks away, or approximately a quarter mile. On my way to borough hall, I pass a grandmother and her autistic grandchild who waves to me every morning as he waits for the bus outside their apartment building.
I then cut through the small concrete playground and give encouragement to two young women who are performing their morning calisthenics. Then I grab my cup of coffee that is waiting for me at the local deli in front of the entrance to the subway: black, no sugar and piping hot, just the way I like it.
Right before I enter the subway, there is a gentleman, Charles, in his 50s, who waits just outside the station every morning and greets commuters with a smile and an enthusiastic "Hello." No one knows what he does, but he is a local and is always there. Hey, this is New York, don’t ask questions!
This experience is real and it happens all over the world in cities, towns and villages that depend on efficient rail networks. High-density developments spring up around rail stations and encourage social and economic interaction amongst patrons and rail encouraged enterprises. Businesses and communities can depend on rail being their in the future and structure investment around pedestrian traffic generated by stations and exchanges.
This efficient, best land use that results from rail development stands in stark contrast to the type of development that results from a car-dependent metropolitan region. The automobile gutted the great cities of the world, literally and psychologically; and especially the Midwest cities not constrained by geography. Sprawl resulted in congestion. And in cities like Milwaukee, sprawl took the very fabric of social interaction from the urban core.
The KRM should be the beginning of a push to bring an efficient and fixed public transit network back to the southeastern Wisconsin region. Why not build commuter lines running north along Interstate 43 and west along I-94? Or, as in the case of Atlanta, Ga..'s new Beltline project, refurbish our old, and underutilized freight lines that run through the Menomonee River Valley and brewery valley to serve as new transit-oriented development corridors?
It is possible that with vision, conviction and intelligent planning that instead of your typical southeastern Wisconsin commuter getting up, walking half a step to the garage, driving to work alone, parking at work and never once speaking with or interacting with a single other human being (angry talk radio hosts don’t count), we can experience what city dwellers were meant to experience - other people.
Andrew Steininger is the community assistance specialist at the Office of the Brooklyn Borough President in Brooklyn, N.Y. He is a former Wisconsin resident. He is responding to previous Milwaukee Biz Blogs about the proposed KRM (Kenosha Racine Milwaukee) rail project.



5 Comments
Mr. Steininger,
Congratulations on finding your Utopia while utilizing the subway in New York. But once again you miss the point. Why should my tax dollars support your chosen means of transportation?
Your comments do not address the most basic objection to this or to most public mass transit plans - the massive taxpayer subsidies that are needed to keep the buses, trains and streetcars running. I am tired of politicans constantly picking my pocket to pay for these programs. Can you please tell me when you are going to pay for my chosen method to transport myself, my car. Until someone tells me a better way to cover the massive deficit that will be generated by the KRM (and don't tell me ridership will pay, because I am not stupid, you can't charge that much for the ticket), I will not support this black hole project.
By the way, Mr Steininger, don't tell me urban sprawl and the automobile is the cause of the problems in the urban core. The only connection there is the automobile is used in the drive by shootings. The problems there are much deeper than me not talking to my neighbor.
Wow!
Let's look over this description of rail and put it in Milwaukee where there is less population density and things are farther apart.
Let's pretend I live on 105th and Grant Street. This is in West Allis. Nice typical suburban neighborhood. House here cost $80,000. Ready?
I walk about three blocks to the bus. The elderly lady in one of the houses has not shoveled her walk so I must go through some snow and ice. I do not fall often, but I have to walk a little slower here to be careful. Luckily, I am not in a hurry. I wave to her autistic kid, as his bus pulls up in front of his door.
It is hard to cut through the playground since they installed fences to keep people who do not belong on playgrounds from getting near the kids. I say hi to two women working out, and they pretend to ignore me. Most women working out are not interested in comments from men they do not know. I have to stand in line for coffee, which I get from the self serve counter of the gas station. I get the coffee just how I like it, since I actually get the coffee.
I get on the bus on Lincoln Ave. I transfer 2 times before I get to the Amtrak station. There is a guy at the Amtrak station who greets everyone enthusiastically. He creeps me out. No one knows why he is there. I wish the cops would make him leave, but this is Milwaukee, he is always there. Don't ask questions.
This experience is real. I wish it wasn't. I wish I had a car so I could drive, listen to the radio, talk to friends on the cell phone, and be in an environment I have better control over.
Rail develops around high density developments. High density development occurs FIRST, then rail.
Next time you create your description of urban paradise, please include the smells and sounds as well. Your little essay rocks. Urban rail rocks equally as well.
Keep on rockin' in the free world, Andrew.
Dean, what you don't realize (or choose to ignore) is that your driving habits are heavily subsidized, for road construction and maintenance. Interstates aren't cheap, and neither is re-paving them every 4-5 years because Wisconsin's climate requires it. A bus commuter might well ask why his tax dollars need to fund these huge government expenditures.
Art, there is a hierarchy in transit systems, just as there is a hierarchy in roads. Airplanes and Amtrak-style systems are at the top - they make limited stops and have a high ticket price. Commuter rail, like KRM, is on a regional level, and has stops every 4-8 miles. It won't turn south-eastern WI into New York anytime soon. What it can do is make Milwaukee, Kenosha, Racine, and Chicago-area jobs available to the people living in communities along the line, which are a good 10-15 miles from I-90. While the auto-rental tax is in my opinion a poor way to fund KRM, it doesn't make the line a bad idea.
RE: Tim Freeman- The state transportation fund is funded by gas taxes. If I recall, Gov. Doyle raided the state transportation fund of "excess" money in the previous budget and used that money for other programs.
Tell the truth- your typical bus commuter is being heavily subsidized by the taxpayers (including via gas taxes) as bus fares do not even cover the operating costs of the bus service, much less the cost of the roads the buses are using. Also, the income level of your typical bus rider does not generate income taxes anywhere near the level produced by the typical taxpayer with a car.
Finally, if 99% of the public in Wisconsin uses automobiles, how is auto travel subsidized?
Milwaukee, rail? NOT A CHANCE!
I grew up in Milwaukee but now live in Chicago. Chicago has better jobs, better pay. (We all want better pay don't we?) I would love to spend that Chicago paycheck living in frugal Milwaukee--but without a rail system that is efficient, I wont.
Some do, a few live in the 3rd ward and take the 90 min Amtrak commute, but not until that commute time is reduced to an hour will you see a difference. Acela service between the two cities would see that time reduced to 45 minutes—which is then very competitive with Chicago suburban rail (Metra) travel times. People would move to Milwaukee from Chicagoland because of the cost of living difference – I would!
But this will probably never happen.
Milwaukee is technically a bigger city than Boston, yet, there is a high speed train that connects Boston with New york--and the distance between Milwaukee and Chicago is closer than that of New York – Boston.
Even with Milwaukee's socialistic storied past (from socialist mayors, to bountiful welfare programs), they can't see value in this.
All will agree the most important aspect of any society is jobs. This is the reason I moved to Chicago. Creating an efficient rail link to Chicago will result in:
• Giving Milwaukeens more jobs to choose from.
• Giving Milwaukeens the opportunity to work in the Chicago Loop – one of the biggest financial markets in the world.
• Giving Milwaukeens jobs with much higher salaries.
• Giving Chicagoans a good excuse to move to Milwaukee (Spend that Chicago paycheck in frugal Milwaukee)
• Increasing the Milwaukee Tax base
• Increasing quality of life of Milwaukee
But to Milwaukeeans, this sounds ridiculous and thus why Milwaukee will always be…well, Milwaukee.
John Henkel